Dec 27, 2019
December 27, 2019 - /PressAdvantage/ - Johnson and Johnson received a favorable ruling in a lawsuit alleging that their baby powder formula caused ovarian cancer. On late friday, December 20, 2019, the jury ruled 9-3 in favor of Johnson and Johnson denying the allegation by a 56 year old woman, Vickie Forrest, who claimed that exposure to asbestos due to the use of their products for over 30 years caused her illness. Another key evidentiary ruling in a federal proceeding in which a large number of talcum powder cases have been collected could be handed down by a presiding judge in New Jersey any day now.
St. Louis courts, where the case was tried, have been historically friendly to the plaintiffs. Johnson and Johnson had lost a previous ruling there when St. Louis awarded $4.7 billion to the families who claimed that the baby powder contained asbestos which is known to cause cancer. The jury had awarded $25 million to each family that sued and $3.15 billion in punitive damages against Johnson and Johnson. The case is currently under appeal. In response to that verdict Johnson & Johnson said it was “deeply disappointed” in a “fundamentally unfair process that allowed plaintiffs to present a group of 22 women, most of whom had no connection to Missouri, in a single case all alleging that they developed ovarian cancer.”
An FDA warning in the fall of 2019 claimed that the agency found trace amounts of asbestos in a bottle of Johnson and Johnson baby powder. This led to a recall of around 33,000 bottles of baby powder. The company later rebuked the findings by performing its own testing by two independent labs and claiming that the FDA tests were flawed. This is the latest in a series of recent rulings that has gone in its favor. The FDA stood by its findings. Johnson and Johnson says that it performs routine tests to ensure that their products are asbestos free.
Talc is a clay mineral composed of hydrated magnesium silicate. During the mining, the deposits can be contaminated with asbestos. Asbestos is a carcinogen when inhaled or swallowed in microscopic powder form. The term “asbestos cancer” commonly refers to mesothelioma though it is also linked to ovarian cancer and other illnesses. Every year 2400 to 2800 people are diagnosed with it in the US. The first time the negative health effects of asbestos were studied was in the late 19th century. In the 1970s when the dangers of asbestos were widespread public knowledge, its use was reduced, was phased out starting in 1989 and was banned entirely in 2003.
The first case against Johnson and Johnson was filed by Deanne Berg in 2013. The suit alleged that Johnson and Johnson failed to warn consumers about the dangers of their product, especially when used in women’s genital area. On April 30, 2014, a class action lawsuit was filed against Johnson and Johnson in California for consumer fraud. That case is still ongoing. In the following years, multiple plaintiffs have been awarded multimillion dollar amounts in damages by the courts.The company currently faces personal injury litigation from over 100,000 plaintiffs. All of the lawsuits allege that the company failed to disclose to the public the risks associated with using talcum powder products, failed to conduct research on the connection between ovarian cancer and talcum powder after numerous reports of the same, failed to recall products, failed to warn of the cancer risks, and failed to research different formulas of their powder products to eliminate the use of talc.
Anyone who has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and has been a lifelong user of talcum powder may have a case against the company. The victims or their family members can reach out to a legal team at www.talcumpowder.org for a free case evaluation. The website has a timeline of the discovery of the health hazards of talcum powder products and the corresponding history of litigation.
###
For more information about Drug-Lawsuits.org, contact the company here:
Drug-Lawsuits.org
[email protected]
ReleaseID: 60032455
Cuban exiles in Florida are increasingly hopeful that regime change in Cuba is now on the horizon.
The Trump administration may have just signed up your child — and more than 60 million others — for a 530A savings account (if you haven’t already done so).
The higher yields, which are pressuring consumer and corporate borrowers and increasingly weighing on certain corners of the stock market, are unlikely to dissipate soon.
Campaigners and Green Party leader Zack Polanski raise concerns about Rosebank's ties to an Israeli firm.
The Treasury Committee, which is responsible for overseeing HMRC, has urged the body to scrutinise tax implications of the Manchester City verdict.
The average 30-year, fixed-rate home loan rose to 7.28 percent, up from 6.34 percent a year ago. More buyers are now turning to adjustable-rate mortgages.
The firm has apologised to the family.
The airline helpfully rebooked a delayed traveler from Toronto, but failed to mention it had also canceled her return trip. She spent $800 to get home.
Room intrusions were still being reported at one-in-10 Travelodge hotels this summer, a review finds.
An ad produced by the manufacturing company SKF Group featured a digital version of the Swedish American actress, who died in 1990. Not all viewers found the replica convincing.
Both petrol and diesel prices have risen by a third or more in just the past seven months.
Martin Lewis says though they are the UK's most popular form of savings, not everybody benefits from them. Martin explains who premium bonds are best for, and who they aren’t so good for.
YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.
Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?
Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.